[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.12512909 [View]
File: 109 KB, 1024x640, Image_4-PhotoCredit-MikeNayna-1024x640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12512909

>>12512821

>can and has destroyed every single alt-right debater by simply asking them what it would take for them to stop believing their points of view and watch them flounder around

This is a good point. I was listening to a conversation with Peter Boghossian (also with Heying, Weinstein and Hoff-Sommers, for anyone interested) a week or so ago. He said that this was the only efficient method he's found when talking to people about faith.

But now comes the problem: What the grievance studies departments are cranking out is classified as science. So you follow that route. You'll end up with a real dilemma: How do you disprove an epistemology?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]