/lit/ - Literature

>>22899265
You realize dating apps exist specifically for meeting women, blackpilling doomer faggot? If someone wants to find a gf, all he has to do is set up a Tinder profile.

what is a 'wordcel'? I see this word thrown around quite a bit here, but it just seems like esl cope

>>22731802
What does good prose look like to you? Have you written a novel, faggot?

>>22731159
>anon has question about chinese
>call him racist

>look up indigenous europeans
>a bunch of articles about the Saami and Romani show up
>nothing about actual europeans
what did they mean by this? i guess you can only be indigenous if you're not white?

>>22618436
Many such cases. It makes no sense.

>>21839679
>the secret was to just pump out as much writing as humanly possible
if that's the secret why aren't you a successful author yet

Thinking about starting a /lit/ + /x/ themed youtube channel. I want to talk about philosophy, religion, esotericism, the occult and other schizo topics...
Any tips?

>>20275321
>>20276449
>>20276454
If smart people are so smart why don't they use some of that brainpower to save themselves?

>uhhh yeah lets just give the workers direct control of the means of production


how exactly do commies think this is going to work? its just going to end up with mob rule (hijacked by a charismatic leader) or a sham democracy oligarchy like today

>>18960249
>White guy named Ma
>Asian guy named Waldun

>White guy's surname is "Ma"
>Asian guy's surname is "Waldun"
????

>character starts talking about their grandfather
>refers to them by some bizarre combination of syllables like "pap" and "paw" with an "-y" at the end

I just made a summary of this brainlet tier book: Atomi Habits. It's just 4 pages and it sums the book completely well. Where could I upload it so other non will find it?
Also the book says nothing too interesting or unpredictable. I think shit books like this should be mandatorily summarized.

Can any Christian explain the why the differences in the four gospels? I've finished reading three and this is what I've seen:
>Matthew and Mark have Judas betray Jesus for no explicable reason, but in Luke it said that Satan took over his body
>In Matthew and Mark, the first disciples were just fishing and when Jesus told them that they were going to be "fisher of men" they went right away, while in Luke they caught a ton of fish and then went with him
>In Matthew and Mark, when Jesus said that Peter was going to deny him three times Peter got angry and Jesus told Satan to leave his body, while in Luke, Peter didn't get angry and the story continued
>The apostles fell asleep 3 times during the scene before Jesus was going to get captured by the Pharisees in Mark and Matthew, but only once in Luke
>There is no origin story for Mark and Matthew, but in Luke it explains how Jesus and John the Baptist came to be

It honestly seems so far that Luke has the most literary "flesh" so to speak while the other ones aren't as good

an oath-breaker? Janny is a faggot
a deal-breaker? Janny is a nigger
a Judas? Janny is a kike
a double-crosser? Janny is a tranny

just finished up marathoning some reading on world war, why did we stop doing this? it seems like a great system.

I'm starting to read Hegel's PhS and just want some confirmation. The entire point of this is to outline the stages of mind that lead to "Science"?

>chiropractors, exorcists, creationists, flat earthers, electric universe types etc
>not welcome in academia
>yet marxists are
How come? Is it because marxists have managed to conceptualize the idea of objective reality as oppressive and therefore don't need to answer to facts?

>>15548292>>15548477
what if faggots are the result of women shaving their legs?