/lit/ - Literature

>>4814136
A better and less ambiguous way of putting what he likely means is
>The universe is contingent, and not necessary. There is no reason for it to exist or to have ever come into existence, it is not necessary for it to exist or illogical for it to not exist. All contingent things rely for their existence or truth on another thing.

>>4763199
>This is not "pointless French influence."
It is. It was only adopted by the British in the 17th century because the French used it. There was no other purpose. Sorry. The American English spelling is the traditional one, if you don't want to use it that's fine, and if use refuse to use it in order to attempt an artificial distinction that's your prerogative bro, I'm just briefing you on the etymology. I'll keep using theater, especially since the art takes place in the location and derives its name from it.

>>4661250
>I don't believe the two are really comparable in that sense.
Then I don't really have anything to say since I'm explicitly arguing against anti-natalism, sorry broski.