[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.20465264 [View]
File: 1.12 MB, 725x3394, aed8b5b6-3aa6-4a5b-a65e-b2aceb89a035.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20465264

>>20465197

>> No.20286869 [View]
File: 1.12 MB, 725x3394, 1621539629077.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20286869

>>20286838
Just like you'd have Shavites/Vaishnvaists
As said before the Christian Trinity is essentialy just a Personal spin on the Ishvara system, in fact maybe it's a sort of dilution or close parralel to the Satchitananda, further increasing coincidences,

JESUS CHRIST WAS AN ADVAITIN

>> No.18346397 [View]
File: 1.12 MB, 725x3394, holybased.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18346397

>>18345928
>I have many other critiques that led me to not accepting the doctrine as Truth, but they would be too lengthy to discuss here
how do you reconcile the vedantic non-dualism and the atman=brahman identification with christianity ? thoses are the two things that vedanta convinced me of
pic rel

>Beyond the doctrinal critiques, there is also the issue of the failure of Shankaran (and general Hindu) cosmologies to accurately explain the case of Jesus of Nazareth, and the events surrounding His resurrection
the buddhists have an interesting theory
see https://www.amazon.fr/Rainbow-Body-Resurrection-Attainment-Dissolution/dp/1583947957

i have problem with the amorality of brahman (and of adi shankara https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/15900/was-adi-shankaracharya-s-parakaya-pravesha-to-learn-kamashastra-dharmic ) tho

>The idea that Jesus Christ was yet another incarnation of Vishnu, or simply a human who achieved moksha, are all inadequate theories which fail to hold upon scrutiny.
please elaborate

>In the end, most of the trouble results from vestigial polytheistic cosmologies which must be abandoned and transcended to come to a further discovery of divine dharma
this is the thesis of jean vaquié, who, in response to guénon, opposes the babelian tradition and the apostolic tradition

How can we understand that Hindu and Advaitin mystics reach what seems to be the beatific vision? And how can we understand the exclusiveness of salvation with that?

their methods (raja yoga for example) seem to be even more effective than the Christian methods, where the saint waits more for grace to fall on him

>Hopefully this helped
yes very much ty anon

>> No.18312209 [View]
File: 1.12 MB, 725x3394, holybased.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18312209

>>18309410

>> No.18309668 [View]
File: 1.12 MB, 725x3394, holybased.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18309668

>>18306094
>Alphonse Levée
who?

>Some Christian metaphysicians have reached almost identical or highly similar conclusions to Advaita about God and reality despite not knowing about Indian writings.
if u have names

>> No.18282524 [View]
File: 1.12 MB, 725x3394, holybased.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18282524

>>18282477
>>18282483
>>18280395
pic rel.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]