[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.20584846 [View]
File: 984 KB, 1597x4573, IMG_20220626_072230540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20584846

>Wife mad about abortion overturn
>Starts ranting anout the bible and Christian stupidity
>Says most religion is just their own interpretations of the bible
>She keeps seething but being very informative
>After her rant decide to read the bible and see what the fucks the big deal
>Very curious to what I learn seeing as how I havent looked into any religion whatsoever

Anyways heres my question. She saying to use her version which is pic related. This is what she used during her presbyterian studies and says it just makes it easier to read compared to the all popular king james version. I just want to be sure that her version is a good translation of original. Also should i get a king james version anyways to compare to hers?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]