/lit/ - Literature

>>17550900
>implying that a pop debate is actually an arena for intellectual exchange and not just a glorified shitting match
being good at public speaking and talking quickly is not a benchmark of intelligence or intellectual depth. you are not engaging with ideas, you are glorifying peterson because of his ability to churn out witty hot air. this is only compounded by the fact that your only response is "he would destroy you in a debate" rather than actually offering a counterargument. you're not interested in thinking, you just want to watch academic WWE to make your brain feel nice.