/lit/ - Literature

>>11054563
>boogeyman from /pol/
Bill Whittle can hardly be called /pol/ and his video is the best on the topic in existence.
Presumably you've seen it.
Marxism, having failed so spectacularly in the realm of economics, had it's followers scrambling for an explanation (ie rationalization) for why so they, and there is historical account of this fact, decided to incorpoate cultural science and social engineering into Marx's critique of capitalism and advocacy of communism. All to keep their utopian sensibilities unmarred.

>ideologue
Theres that word again. Centrists and nihilists like to throw that word around alot as of it were a grave insult. The fallacy that having an ideology to which one closely follows and subscribes is somehow a bad thing is pure sophistry. The only question is WHAT a specific ideology actually constitues and WHICH criterion one has assessed it's alleged flaws and strengths by. There is also this moronic implication you are positing that being an ideologue and being a philosopher are somehow mutually exclusive. They aren't.
She matched and exceeded all the criteria by which a philosophy may be considered a concrete and integrated phiosophic system and it is only the absurdity that the gatekeepers of stagnant mainstream academia like to argue that their consensus approval is one of these criteria is the only point Rand haters have against Objectivism.
>as soon as Ayn Rand needed to she started sucking off the teat of the state
Yawn. http://www.aynrandmyths.com/

>this thread
Book recommendation faggots