/lit/ - Literature

King does some decent dystopia. I never found myself questioning the environment he created for the book. Probably because he was using the political situation to drive the plot as opposed to spewing ideological jargon, I suppose

Honestly /lit/, cut the bullshit.

This thread is getting a bump.I am so tired of the SAGE SAGE SAGE SOMETHING NEW SAGE mentatlity 24/7 on /lit/.

The Anime troll returns

>>1136143
Nah, I'm just ignorant and using the wrong term. It's a brother typewriter, older and if I had to guess ~70's era. Bought it at a garage sale a few months back, Left it by mistake with my uncle, unfortunately :(

Yeah, there is always tons of crap before the gems. Comb the prehistory of film and gain hipster cred by watching awesome diamonds they've probably never heard of

1980's is where it's at, if you ask me.

I seem to remember my prof talking about this one. Written shortly before Hemmingway committed suicide, aparently

IIRC The older waiter was empathetic with the man because he was essentially in the same boat. Nothing to live for

Nah, it's not cliche.

You just have to be careful not to make the entire story a passive flashback thing where nothing really happens

>>1057457
>entry level
Whenever I hear those words, I think of philosopher-chan. Man, that guy was an asswipe. I'm thinking they banned him in the end, because there was no way in hell that guy was going to go otherwise like he did.

Anyhoo, in responce to yer question Emile Durkhiem/Max Weber/Karl Marx are the fathers of sociology

>>1042723
When I was little, my friends and I would sing that song incessantly. It was funny, in a morbid kind of way.

>about The Man in the High Castle
>Style is horrible

Go ahead and make your own opinions, but as a history buff I absolutely LOVED that book.

>how can people take stagolee seriously? He's a 3/10 troll
Fixed it for you.Getting better, you were 1/10 for the longest time.

is reality real?

report back, soldier

go_on.jpg

>>981780
moar like not willing to accept compromise in the face of overwelming defeat

>Book-related discussions used to be the norm
>Now /lit/ is just trolling and Meta
>Why you do this

>>877455
me too

to be quite honest, I just never need anything. Thanks for the kindness, OP

>>818480
adios.

maybe we'll get more of these threads in the future?

>>806574
you are everything that is wrong with this world