[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22461451 [View]
File: 284 KB, 1622x2048, IMG_1123.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22461451

Never been refuted. Never will

>> No.20802808 [View]
File: 284 KB, 1622x2048, 1622744988571.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20802808

Christcucks are so stupid. You retards are like children

>"Might makes right" has little to do with it.

Might makes right has everything to do with it. Every christcuck argument for the existence of god and objective morality reduces to an appeal to authority in the end. Christcuck "philosophy" is like a little kid telling everyone else his mommy told him something so it must be true. Christcucks have no good answer for stuff like pic related and always have to resort to childish godmodding ("god has a plan for existence of evil, it's all part of god's 5D chess plan brahhhh") to get around them

Even the best christcuck pseudophilosophers like William Lane Craig have absolutely infantile arguments for the existence of god and the validity of morality. I've never seen a single christcuck try to tackle real philosophical problems with morality, such as the epistemological issue of the impossibility of grasping objective truth through the subjective lens of human interpretation. It's all just a bunch of cuckservative mental gymnastics to justify them feeling superior to everyone else lmao.

>> No.20344507 [View]
File: 284 KB, 1622x2048, 8o4v93d735t41.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20344507

The God meme was already solved 2300 years ago, and yet I can´t be free of teenage social rejects and their live action roleplays.

>> No.20338745 [View]
File: 284 KB, 1622x2048, epicureanparadox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20338745

I have a couple of questions for Christians here:
>Do you consider faith to be logical?
>Do you think humans can fully comprehend God?
At the expense of sounding like a complete redditard for admitting this, I'm an atheist and have heard some logical arguments in favor of believing in a God, but the Epicurean paradox always seems to trump any argument in favor of a benevolent God. Gnosticism is the only theology that makes the most sense to me as I find it hard to believe in a supposedly benevolent God that creates a world full of sin and suffering. So I come asking the prior two questions, because I want to know if Christians consider their belief to be something logical and if they do even if they don't think they can fully understand God.

>> No.18988572 [View]
File: 284 KB, 1622x2048, BC2E6A82-8CA3-43F6-B83D-8941609C671A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18988572

>”It’s invalid and debunked because, because it just IS, okay?!”

>> No.18518970 [View]
File: 284 KB, 1622x2048, 8o4v93d735t41.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18518970

>>18518931
>if god is all-knowing, all-loving, and all-powerful, then why is there evil (or, more broadly, why do any bad things happen)?
if you have a way to puzzle this out that allows a god of those qualities to coexist with evil, i'd love to hear it

>> No.18474875 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 284 KB, 1622x2048, 8o4v93d735t41.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18474875

christians of /lit/, how do you answer the problem of evil?

>> No.17630042 [View]
File: 284 KB, 1622x2048, 8o4v93d735t41.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17630042

How do you refute this?

>> No.15221741 [View]
File: 284 KB, 1622x2048, Epicurean paradox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15221741

Literally impossible to refute

>> No.15127023 [View]
File: 284 KB, 1622x2048, problem of evil.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15127023

Is there a good theistic rebuttal to the problem of evil?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]