/lit/ - Literature

>>18659659
at least the revisionists make it obvious

this is new meme
you like new meme

Damn these anti nazi people sure get their panties in a knot
Pic related is proof contemporary art is alive and well

>>18614283
It's not the most clear though; that's the point. It's not clear at all. It is more convenient and digestible than it is clear. An examination of qualitative changes and their prospects for growth may be more clear or enlightening. You said earlier
>If you have a capitalist economy and something like GDP starts to contract generally speaking it's safe to say peoples life quality is decreasing but obviously there's no guarantee.
The problem is that the inverted statement is even more tenuous and on higher resolution drops all pretense of truth value: there may be an association between higher GDP and higher quality-of-life but nobody would dare venture into any statement more concrete than that. Low GDP countries that catch up to the contemporary advanced country levels will have very different quality-of-life evolutions than those that were the first to reach a high level. Same goes for many purely economic indicators. On the atomic level a higher income only represents a higher capacity for consumption and leisure goods, it makes no pretense to quality-of-life unless conflating consumption with a quality life.

>>11780895
>What it really was was that he had had
THIS IS NEW MEME

what is the new meme of literature?