/lit/ - Literature

I have difficulty with the ontological status of maya
I see no other option than being and non-being
even when Guénon talks about this he plays with words, what he calls being is the manifested, so even his non-being (the unmanifested) exists in a form, it is not strict non-being
the whole of advaita vedanta is based on the existence of maya, without that it is incoherent
and maya rests on something for which we have no proof or argument or evidence supporting it, and absolutely everything against it, namely the existence of a thing neither true nor false, neither existing nor non-existing
and don't give me the example of an illusion, an illusion exists

>>18896017
You can reduce the definition of your own consciousness to a set of chemicals-based algorithms, you retard.