/lit/ - Literature

Sup /lit/.

I don't read much but now that I decided to quit vidya and use that time for something better I thought I might pick up a book again. The last book I read was World Without End ky Ken Follet and I absolutely loved in.

Any protips on what I should pick up?

I find analytic philosophy interesting, but I also like a lot of continental philosophy. So does it have to be one way or another? Can't we all just get along?

Being and Nothingness by Sartre

>>1378628
>toodeepforyou.jpg

>>1216932
I have.

sure is hipster apologist in here

>read articles on Nietzsche
>listen to epic 24 lecture series on Nietzsche by Robert Solomon, feel i understand his philosophy well by now
>read Zarathustra
>actually understand what he is doing and the points he is making
>enjoy the book and feel inspired
>mfw when im intellectually superior

Didn't like Atlas Shrugged?

>my face when my ex didn't like Ayn Rand

>criticizing kafka on /lit/
Inb4 shitstorm

>>835269
too deep for everyone?

how important does /lit/ think meter, assonance, consonance, alliteration, rhyme, etc. are in song lyrics? pic unrelated

What's the matter, chump?

Too DEEP for you?

>>778990 deep
>anime

The voices echo in my head. Conflicting stories and unfinished sentences that are stuttered and broken. My consciousness is fading, fading, fading into submissive hibernation. Nothing is wrong, nothing is right, all is up and down. Walk forward, sit up straight, inside voice, "Everything society has taught us can not co-exist with nature, creation", such a lie. There is a light at the end of the tunnel, and it's burning out, the tunnel is ever longer and grace is fading, fading, fading... Red walls, red walls, red hands.

Critique, anyone?

>>716986
I've taken him for granted! :(

Art is inherently anti-intellectual.

>>449683

This is the result of most big cities being Democratic, while the country is republican. Or is the cause and effect reversed?

>>426364
>Solzhenitsyn

Just had a look in Wikipedia.

>a two-volume work on the history of Russian-Jewish relations (Two Hundred Years Together 2001, 2002). This book stirred controversy and some viewed it as antisemitic.[45][46][47][48]
>antisemitic.[45][46][47][48]
>[45][46][47][48]

I lol'd.