/lit/ - Literature

This book is the final blackpill, even more brutal than Denial of Death
>Not all males get a chance, many remain without females and without sex. That's female choice, a law of evolution.
>“Sex is a finite resource for males that females control. The fact that males try often and persistently to establish sexual contact with females and that females almost always refuse these attempts is not a fault of the system - it is the system. "
>Meike Stoverock spreads out the panorama of evolutionary biological relationships with relish - and the conclusion that comes to mind when reading this: humans are also only mammals. From a scientific point of view, the principle of female choice must also apply to them. That’s how it used to be, the author explains convincingly.
>"Today's world population has about twice as many female as male ancestors, so in pre-cultural times around 70% of women mated with 35% of men."
>Men must be brave when reading this book - because the biologist assumes that many of them will no longer find a partner. What is ignored in this biological perspective: Men and women are probably more than the sum of their instincts. They don't just bind to each other to complete an evolutionary reproductive program. However, the biologist is right in her observation that the so-called Incels, the involuntarily celibate men, can be dangerous. Incels also exist in the animal kingdom.
>“They are the 'rest', the non-premium males, who remain after the evolutionary screening process and have no chance of reproduction. This phenomenon has only been suppressed to this day by the male civilization that controlled and disenfranchised women. "
>Now Meike Stoverock makes suggestions as to what the coexistence of men and women could look like in a post-male civilization, a world order in which women tend to choose several alpha men in the course of their lives, but in which not every pot has a lid. She reckons with the institution of marriage, in which she sees an instrument of the oppression of women, and calls for a departure from the romantic notion that men and women can be happy in lifelong monogamy.
>Men who can no longer find women in this new world order should be cared for in other ways - Stoverock thinks about sex assistants and the role of prostitution, she describes pornography as a possible “socially acceptable support” for men.
Now that even the liberal elites recognize the scope of the incel problem and the validity of blackpill ideology how should our society be reorganized in order to accomodate the superflous men? Any books about this?

This book is the final blackpill, even more brutal than Denial of Death
>Not all males get a chance, many remain without females and without sex. That's female choice, a law of evolution.
>“Sex is a finite resource for males that females control. The fact that males try often and persistently to establish sexual contact with females and that females almost always refuse these attempts is not a fault of the system - it is the system. "
>Meike Stoverock spreads out the panorama of evolutionary biological relationships with relish - and the conclusion that comes to mind when reading this: humans are also only mammals. From a scientific point of view, the principle of female choice must also apply to them. That’s how it used to be, the author explains convincingly.
>"Today's world population has about twice as many female as male ancestors, so in pre-cultural times around 70% of women mated with 35% of men."
>Men must be brave when reading this book - because the biologist assumes that many of them will no longer find a partner. What is ignored in this biological perspective: Men and women are probably more than the sum of their instincts. They don't just bind to each other to complete an evolutionary reproductive program. However, the biologist is right in her observation that the so-called Incels, the involuntarily celibate men, can be dangerous. Incels also exist in the animal kingdom.
>“They are the 'rest', the non-premium males, who remain after the evolutionary screening process and have no chance of reproduction. This phenomenon has only been suppressed to this day by the male civilization that controlled and disenfranchised women. "
>Now Meike Stoverock makes suggestions as to what the coexistence of men and women could look like in a post-male civilization, a world order in which women tend to choose several alpha men in the course of their lives, but in which not every pot has a lid. She reckons with the institution of marriage, in which she sees an instrument of the oppression of women, and calls for a departure from the romantic notion that men and women can be happy in lifelong monogamy.
>Men who can no longer find women in this new world order should be cared for in other ways - Stoverock thinks about sex assistants and the role of prostitution, she describes pornography as a possible “socially acceptable support” for men.
Now that even the liberal elites recognize the scope of the incel problem and the validity of blackpill ideology how should our society be reorganized in order to accomodate the superflous men? Any books about this?