[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.9007813 [View]
File: 321 KB, 1463x1986, nietzschecolor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9007813

>>9007809
>>9007809
>>9007809

>> No.9007806 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 321 KB, 1463x1986, nietzschecolor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9007806

I stopped listening to the podcast halfway through (might finish it later today) and as irritating as Sam Harris is, it was Jordan Peterson who ruined the conversation by misunderstanding Nietzsche's answer to the question "what is true?" and linking him to romantics like Schelling and pragmatists like William James. This error, along with Peterson's willingness to redefine and obfuscate the concept of truth, makes me think he is not as concerned with getting to the bottom of things as he is with warding off boredom by reveling in the confusion he stirs up within himself.

Nietzsche believed that happiness and unhappiness, utility and disadvantage, and conclusiveness to the preservation of life, are all irrelevant to the truth of a proposition.

"A belief may be necessary condition of life and yet be false."
"...what presumption to decree that all that is necessary for my preservation must also really be there! As if my preservation were anything necessary!"

From Kaufmann: Nietzsche doubts that there is any "pre-established harmony" between truth and pleasure. Nietzsche concludes that the "will to truth," not being founded on considerations of utility, means—"there remains no choice—'I will not deceive, not even myself': and with this we are on the ground of morality."

Nietzsche goes further: "appearance, error, deception, dissimulation, delusion, self-delusion" all aid life; life "has always shown itself to be on the side of the most unscrupulous polytropoi (the wily and versatile)": is not then the "will to truth" a mere "quixotism"? No, says Nietzsche—it is something rather more terrifying, "namely a principle that is hostile to life and destructive," perhaps even "a hidden will to death."

Thus Nietzsche scorns any utilitarian or pragmatic approach to truth and insists that those who search for it must never ask whether the truth will profit or harm them—and yet he considers the will to truth a form of the will to power.

Nietzsche values power not as a means but as the state of being that man desires for its own sake as his own ultimate end. And truth he considers an essential aspect of this state of being.

When Nietzsche describes the will to truth as "a principle that is hostile to life and destructive," he is entirely consistent with his emphatic and fundamental assertion that man wants power more than life. Nietzsche does not condemn the passion for truth but declares truth to be "divine." Power is a state of being for which man willingly risks death and from which he excludes himself if he "tolerates slack feelings in his faith and judgments." Untruth, in short, is weakness, and truth is power—even if it spells death.

>> No.8686440 [View]
File: 321 KB, 1463x1986, nietzschecolor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8686440

>>8686436
Not into hacks.

>>8686435
I colorized this picture. Here's one I did of Nietzsche.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]