[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17758267 [View]
File: 18 KB, 474x317, 1613545642410.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17758267

>sophists are bad because... uhhhh... they just are OK???

>> No.17592853 [View]
File: 18 KB, 474x317, 1613545642410.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17592853

>>17592794
>N-NOOOO MUH HOMER IS HIGHBROW YOU CANT JUST COMPARE HIM WITH ANIME NOOO

>> No.17567785 [View]
File: 18 KB, 474x317, StartWithTheGreeks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17567785

>Start with the Greeks
Why? Can some one give me an actual answer?
>So you can understand the heckin' referencerinos!!!!11!1!!1
Surely there's a better reason than that right?
Whatever work I'm reading should stand on it's own and even if I needed to "get" a reference, wouldn't a synopsis of whatever Greek work they're referencing suffice?
I mean, it's not even necessary to read something to get a reference. I know most of the Greek gods and their stories but I haven't read any Greek mythology except for The Iliad, the Odyssey, and Jason and the Argonauts.
I've already read a lot of philosophy just fine without having read anything more than the Republic, so why do people recite this same old silly line?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]