/lit/ - Literature

>>16818588
>Dude, you're a good writer
Thank you, anon. Appreciate it.

>I shit on you a bit earlier in the thread
>I was the anon who said we have similar word choices.
Sorry but, I don't know who you are. In this thread, or the previous one?

>but in context I like this
Do you mean after explaining it myself? The context is weid as fuck, and I understand that it may not come into mind easily/initially without a calm read or even a reread.

>Do you put in mental effort to use verbose language, or is this the way you naturally type?
It comes naturally, but it isn't the only way I type.

>For me, I just write how I want and I've been told it's rather verbose or even pretentious. Read Nabokov and tell me that's not verbose
Almost every writer in history has been verbose and dense as fuck. It can only be pretentious if it's fake/superficial (pretends to be without being), and the fact that someone doesn't care enough about the meaning, doesn't mean it isn't there. I would love to read your work too