/lit/ - Literature

>>4825825

"AESTHETIC" IS NOT SYNONYMOUS WITH "SYMMETRIC", "BEAUTIFUL", "VISUALLY PLEASANT", OR "WELL SHAPED".

HELLO?

>>4735379

COMMIT SUICIDE.

>>4729171

DIRECTING SOMEONE TO /pol/ FOR EVIDENCING "NONMARXIST" SOCIOPOLITICAL VIEWS HAS BECOME A MEME, AND IT IS OBVIOUS THAT IT IS NOW MOSTLY DONE IN AN ATTEMPT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE BOARD'S MAJORITY'S CONSENSUS IN A PATHETIC ATTEMPT TO "BELONG", SO I WOULD SUGGEST THAT YOU REFRAIN FROM DOING SO IN THE FUTURE LEST YOU WANT TO BE SILENTLY SCORNED BY THE WISE ONES.

>>4695163

THAT IS "GARBAGE"; BESIDES, IT IS A CARTOON FOR CHILDREN, AND THE PROTAGONISTS ARE NOT EVEN HUMAN.

>>4668344
>it's about deconstructing the general system of thought of man.

NO; IT IS ABOUT SYNTHESIZING KNOWLEDGE, AND DYNAMIC THOUGHT PATTERNS.

>>4630295

"HUMBLENESS" IS THE WORD THAT I WANTED TO USE.

WITH DICTIONARIES.

>A "BLURB" TAKING HALF OF THE COVERSPACE.
>A "BLURB" ON THE COVER.

>>4574994
>Eating vegan will make you thin

YES, IF YOU DO NOT EAT PROPERLY.

MEAT IS NOT THE ONLY SOURCE OF FATS, AND PROTEIN.

>>4415354
>I think Virginia Woolf's was creative.
>she put stones in her coat pockets and walked into the river. not particularly creative, but very deliberate

>>4403994

WHY DO YOU PRESUME THAT IT WAS NOT A FETISH?

>RUSSIA.

>>4370437

BECAUSE I DO NOT UNDERSTAND HOW IT CANNOT BE POSSIBLE.

A BETTER QUESTION WOULD BE: WHY DO YOU NOT BELIEVE THAT?

>>4364382
WHAT IS THAT IMAGE?

HOW DOES ONE PRONOUNCE "TOOHEY"?

"TU HI", OR "TOO I"?

I PRONOUNCE IT "TU HI".

>>4251887

WHAT BOOKS?

IF YOU ARE GOING TO "BREAK" INTO A MUSEUM FOR A BOOK, WHY DO YOU NOT TAKE IT, INSTEAD OF JUST READING IT?

>>4214580
>How is willing for general economic and social equality "degeneracy" and "debauchery"?

EXPLAINING ANYTHING TO YOU WOULD BE FUTILE, SINCE, APPARENTLY, YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF EXERTING CRITICAL THINKING.

ARE YOU A TEENAGER?

>>4214583

THAT IS IDIOTS' FAULT, NOT THE "TERMS'".

DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT "CULTURAL MARXISM" IS?

>>3738473
>mediums

>>3716967

HOW IS THAT ULTIMATELY DIFFERENT FROM HUNTING, FOR INSTANCE?

THE RESULT IS THE SAME WHETHER THE ANIMAL IS HUNTED, OR RAISED & SLAUGHTERED FOR CONSUMPTION, ONLY THE LATTER METHOD IS MORE PRACTICAL & EFFICIENT.

IT IS SENSELESS & ABSURD TO APPLY MORALITY TO SUCH PRIMARY ASPECT OF LIFE.

>>3571528
>>3571524

>Certainly any children's book.

CERTAINLY ANY CHILDREN'S BOOK WHAT?

>>3507069

"FEMINISM" IS OBVIOUSLY IMPLIED IN THE PROMPT.