/lit/ - Literature

>>20669221
>Imagine spending 2000 years on philosophy, theology, and metaphysics, and this English biologist comes in and destroys it all in one book. After reading this book, I can now confidently say: "There is no God." Dawkinspost in the thread.

>>18657990

>>11798727
>social and biological inferiority of the lower classes

t. enlightened

>>11515187
ITT pseuds with no philosophical background who can't understand Camus in any depth

>>10048387

>>9161053
>Yes, that's "common man" with different wording.
>"They don't share the experience of the common man." = "They don't share the experience of the regular people." Although the latter is not syntactically tight as the former. You're still at the level of Barton, who thinks he must "relate to the common man" (read: write to the lowest common denominator) in order to be a "recognized genius."
>Also, are you really one of those "redpilled" shit guzzlers who ignore certain films because they're created by Jewish artists?

>>7080362
>true nature of an invention

>female authors are just as good as male ones, and I shall defend their honor until my last breath. Chivalry isn't dead.

>>6890799

>>6192161
>If you actually studied linguistics, you would know that he's really only taken seriously in linguistics in the US, and within that at very select institutions, with many top programs like Stanford and OSU teaching him only out of historical significance. Oh wait, you don't actually read anything, or study linguistics, so I guess you wouldn't know this.

>I read for the underlying concepts

>>5947980
>proven
>le fedora professor iz misleading u christian made evrifin!!!

yea great proof samefag, now go read some Evola about how much the world is worse than you