/lit/ - Literature

>>20297577
The usual retarded reply. Yes, the majority of both sexes are trash, but the virtual totality of good authors are men. This suggests that if 90% of male authors are trash, then 99.9% of female authors are trash. The difference is considerable enough that if you made a list of the best 100 authors (past or contemporary), you'd end up with 95 of them being men.

Men and women are not at the same level here. It's like in chess: you can correctly say that in both sexes, the majority sucks. That's true. But the top 100 players are what? 98 men? 99? Clearly, women are inferior. The same is true for literature.

>>15424173

>>15135885
God still loves you, even though you're retarded. Pic related

>>15072315
>subjectivity is a subset of objectivity

>>14952983
Yeah thanks for clearing that up anon

>>14935784

>Cant be a correct conclusion from a bad argument

Argument : There are ghosts in the forest, I shouldn't go there at night.
Conclusion : I should stay in the fucking house at night
Reality : There are predators that will fuck my shit up in the forest at night
Conclusion : The same

So I get the same (correct) conclusion from two different arguments. Pic related, your skull.