/lit/ - Literature

>>5348398
you'll find that most common truths end up resulting in a paradox.

to expound

that which is its own pristine essence cannot be contaminant of another source of thinking, or it merely a composite of values paralleling the logic of its origin

the only way to progress is to stop, or as that other anon said, those who are last will be first

free will requires the ability to shape future events in such a way where their nature is not controlled or restricted in any realms. free will to a drunk is the ability to speak the mind. free will to a teen is to act within the parameters of their curiosity. however, the notion behind both of these definitions stems from subjective experience, and so individual ideas of free will are ironically inhibiting the freedom of people as they are not grounded by a pure source of logic.

christianity asserts that all acts done under the will of god, love, rather than conformation with fallible subjective pragmatics will lead to the purest "will".

you must be choose to be a slave to be a free man

you must choose to fear god to no longer suffer under his power

this was my first /lit/ post, don't hurt me