/lit/ - Literature

>>18069444
Except I reject both you dumb dichotomynigger

>>17757302
>What? No it means the radical dismantling of current modern day society.
>Anarcho-Primitivism is not the same as Anarchism.
Why put the word "anarchism" in anarcho-primitivism if it's got nothing to do with anarchy?
Luddism is not a synonym with anarchism as far as I'm aware.
>let me rephrase it like this, ted himself is not strictly a anarcho-primitivist, but one of the most logical conclusions of his diagnosis would very much align with anarcho-primitivist thought.
That's my entire point. Ted isn't an AnPrim, but that doesn't mean he doesn't align with AnPrims.
>you also have to consider that to destroy it, you may have to destroy civilization as a whole as well.
Destroying Industrial civilization does not equal destroying all civilization. I'm sure most mongolian pastoralists and middle eastern goat-herders would continue their lives as usual regardless of any Technological-Industrial collapse.