/lit/ - Literature

>>19125287

How come philosophy majors are as smart as mathematicians, almost as smart as physicians and smarter than engineers but haven't picked a STEM masterrace major?

Is humanities, dare I say it, the actual masterrace?

why are roastys so anti-intellectual bros? Why do people on THIS board RIGHT NOW have pretensions about their own intelligence despite being in a feminized field?

>>9551065
>>internet intellectuals
>Seriously?

Im thinking about people on the web who watch sargon of akaad and think they know everythign about the world, the

>bold young software engieneers

types.

>It's no more pseudo-science as most other humanities.

well, I dont agree with that, most concepts in "traditional" psychology like IQ, personality, congitive concepts are no less scientific as measure in biology. Congitive psychology and personality tests are as precise as mechanical instruments.

>A lot of these then go on to become therapists - a profession where you have to be not just good, but very good to provide any tangible help

the thing with psychoterapy is that it should even be consideren as a part of psychology, it developed primarily from Freud and psychiatry which are both pesudoscientifical branches.
Therapy is almost never tested for results but people "like it" and that is why they considere it works, when you look at few longitudinal studies for effects, they are mediocre at best...in other words 90% of psychotherapy is an absolute scam.

>>9490348
>implying they aren't inextricably linked

>>29077
>He thinks doctors are smarter then physicists.

>>9133337

>>8882242
>IQ is a terrible way of measuring
This is patently false. IQ is one of the single best predictors of life success and is highly correlated to field of work, field of study, and even life expectancy.

>>8841647
are you a brainlet?

if you're sure that you're a brainlet, your best bet would be to switch

>>8839554
>He thinks intelligence isn't genetic

>>8838158
>No thanks. I have a brain.
t. Brainlet

>humanities are both low-iq AND low-test

really gets those synapses firing huh?

Nope. Men are to robotic and emotionless to write good books

>is it feminine to be a low-iq liberal arts major?