/lit/ - Literature

>>18039363
If there is merit to the ideology (and the individual in question truly understands it), it should be no grand challenge to simplify its core aspects, even into meme-format should you want to. Yet each and every time someone online attempts to argue for the merits of Marxism, they fail to succinctly elaborate on it, needing to first preface even their image macros with walls of text. Why is this? Do online marxists not understand the ideology? Is obscurantism a core part of it, inherited from Hegel? Is it a question of belief and faith, untranslatable into brief explanations and jokes?
"Right wing" memes work because they are simple and easily understood, with key tenets recognizable even to simpletons. Why do leftists continuously fail at replicating this?