/lit/ - Literature

>>21918777
Maybe we need a penmanship general. It would be more on-topic than most of what is in the catalog.

>>16103555
Not him, but what would you expect to be different in a later rendition?

>>16023999
>Pilate washes his hands
>then proceeds to order crucifixion anyways
It is nice to know that innocence can be so easily bought. Also, deathcode trips.

>>15989777
>OP didn't finish the book
I think that it is the latter. I do not think that he would have come to the conclusion that he did without reading the last two pages.

>>15760666
Give a direct example or else stop with this tragically gay meme.

just after a post ending in 999, there's a post ending in 000

dubtrips

>>15532999
HL Richardson's Confrontational Politics covers the fundamental rule of negotiation that is generally overlooked (for when you get to that point). Mein Kampf discusses the benefits of live speech versus printed newspapers. Rules for Corporate Warriors: How to Fight and Survive Attack Group Shakedowns by Nick Nichols covers ways of dealing with the opposition. Taking On the System: Rules for Radical Change in a Digital Era by Kos has some interesting notes on observation of propaganda effects and when and how to escalate or start negotiating.

>>15520666
I am too many years past it to give anything more than that it gave me a substantial feel for the various personalities of their era. It seemed worthwhile at the time. It is a much easier read than Gibbon, who needed to dredge a lot of slag for his task at hand. Plutarch reads a lot more casually.

>>15462999
>You've never been around poor whites, have you?
I have been around them enough to note the distinctions between their vernacular and the vernacular of blacks. Of course, these are poor whites that do not generally mingle with blacks. You need a better control group. I have seen whites speak as you indicate but they are generally affecting blackness.

>>14835777

>>12859888
>all
Not me, bb. I never even had an account.

>>12760222
>holocausr deniers
What qualifies a "denier"? Is it Irving's observation that the charges to bring Dönitz to trial needed to be rescinded and replaced because the original charges were based on unironic wartime propaganda?