/lit/ - Literature

>>18089225
>He stole his ideas and then called names to a dead person. How this is not the resentment which he despised so much?
He stole from a dumb faggot and called the faggot a faggot. What's this got to do with feeling resentful towards a perceived master?

>Wagner wrote about his chronic masturbation.
How would Wagner know? Did Wagner catch Nietzsche masturbating? Did Nietzsche pull a Robbins, traumatizing Wagner and forcing him to slander Nietzsche's good name in retaliation? Jokes aside, you are a gullible fool for believing Wagner on this when, again, Nietzsche wouldn't have accomplished 10% of what he did had it been true.

>If he didn't fucked whores then his insults were even more ironic because he was actually who was virgin.
We don't know Nietzsche's sex life. But even if he was a virgin, Nietzsche's not the one who thought like one, which was his point.

>And living life in a sense that he said that noble races raped, looted and murdered without any guilt.
You're addressing a straw man here. The noble races also loved, invented and made the arts, and engaged in heated but fair competitive sports and debates, without any guilt, according to Nietzsche. Nietzsche's main point of reference for the Greek nobility was a poet who looked down on the poor for being thieves and inartistic barbarians. Master morality is capable of committing evil, but it doesn't view such acts as evil, and it's not neurotically compelled to commit constant acts of it out of sadism.

>OHHH so it was le irony.
It was both light-hearted and serious. Like dancing. Hardly something that should make one feel disgusted. It's not like his comment about Schopenhauer's flute-playing somehow overrode his essay Schopenhauer as Educator and his intense feelings of admiration for the man.

>Throwing resentful insults towards a man who influenced who western philosophy.
They weren't resentful or insults. Did you even read Twilight of the Idols?