/lit/ - Literature

I care not of the form of books,

But I tell you, literature... it will only be obsolete when man has become perfect. Until then, we will write.

How do we know that good is good, and evil is evil ?

What purpose do big words serve if people can't understand them?

Can pedophilic sexual/romantic relationships be legitimate?

>>1591719
Being a robot is not that bad. They still can enjoy things.
BTW I always thought that being a robot was about being some kind of artificial intelligence or advanced machine. But now I've discovered that's just about absolute knowledge. But then... Is God a robot?

If objectivity is equal to intersubjectivity... Why do we use two different nouns to talk about the same thing?

>>1544151
Then why apply sage to your post?

If hipster finally get the popular revolution they're waiting for, will their non-conformist panache allow them to participate?

Hey guys, real quick question I have for my philosophy class. I need some outside input for this. In March Wilt Chamberlain offers you a job working as his driver. If you don’t take the job, you’ll have no rent money and so no apartment. If you try to sleep in an apartment without the owner’s permission, you’ll be thrown in jail.
In April the government taxes the money Chamberlain earns playing basketball, threatening to throw him in jail if he doesn’t pay. It uses the tax for payments to people who don’t have jobs. By collecting some of this money you can pay rent on an apartment even if you don’t take the job with Chamberlain.

Defend or criticize: you are forced to work for the benefit of Chamberlain in March. Defend or criticize: Chamberlain is forced to work for your benefit in April.

What if in the future branches of knowledge, such as science or math, became so developed that it is physically impossible for any human to learn about the subject enough to advance it any further.

How would that subject be viewed upon from then on? What kind of world would we live in? Could this be a realistic scenario?