/lit/ - Literature

Been reading Feser, and it's got me thinking. I'm curious as to why the atheist assumption that we "cease to exist" after death (whatever that's supposed to mean), is somehow more reasonable than the assumption that there's life after death. Non being is unintelligible. Nothing doesn't exist. So how is the assertion that we return to non being not just a dogma that's unsupportable? Theism is far more reasonable in this regard and atheists don't seem to recognize it.

I want to believe in something more but I can't tell if any of the religions of the world have any real basis or if it's hocus pocus or worse yet it's all intentional mind control. Pic related was no help.