/lit/ - Literature

>>20876530
THE ANGLO QUESTION
AND THE PNEUMATIC MANIFESTO
I've read a LOT of the right books and here is my conclusion:

>1.
The process of globalization (which started with the Age of Discovery) is inevitable. It's merely a function of technological progress and capitalism (which started in 12th century Northern Italy)
>2.
In the wrong hands, globalization is degenerative, but it doesn't have to be.
>3.
This degenerative process of globalization is most aptly named "globalism" though it's a vague term. I would say materialist globalism, but nowadays, politically, I think the term "neoliberal globalism" is the best term that is also politically correct. As it turns out later in this treatise, "Anglo globalism" is also a good term as the main driver of this materialist globalism is America (and the UK, thanks to the City).
>4.
With Anglo globalism (the "traditional" uniform of the CCP is called the suit and stems from England), all cultures of the world have been subsumed by one global culture, which quite clearly, evidently and directly stems from Western culture
>5.
Martin Luther didn't intend to destroy the Church, just renew it (reformatio) by merely fixing the corruption festering inside which only got out of hand after the Crisis of the Late Middle Ages (including the Western Schism of 1378-1417). Martin, sadly, ended up completely subverting the Church when German princes realized they got a real prize on their hands, one that finally allows them to disconnect from the Church and embark on unashamed, metaphysically empty statism. The historical moment was Hegelianistically perfect because they also had another political reason for this in the shape of Charles V, who was both overly ambitious, and too weak at the same time, not physically present within the HRE for most of his reign, and within this power vacuum chaos festered. This however would've been just a nuisance for the Church, one that would've been killed off, had it not been for the Anglo:
>6.
Western culture had existed before, but doesn't since 1534 when Western culture split into Continental and Anglo cultures with the Act of Supremacy.when a mere king (rex) decided he is greater than the Pope (the hitherto nominated purveyor of God on this Earth) and ended the almost 1,000-year long communion between England and the Continent (i.e. the period when the West was united and at its best--I'm referring to Christian universalism, which continued on the Continent but died in the Enlightenment) since the Synod of Whitby in 664
>7.
"Anglo-Saxon" is an empty misnomer. It's just Anglo. A fittingly ugly word.
>8.
What remained of Reformation would've been completely killed off during the Counter-Reformation, if not for the Anglos
>9.
Anglo culture doesn't really exist and is just vulgar Materialism (hence the "anglo bugman" meme), this in turn stems from the combination of the worst features of Germanic and Romance cultures, i.e. the creation of "England"

Part 1 out of 9

>>20839725
Here's the kicker: the Demiurge combines with the concept of the Capital I laid out a while earlier.

From the first Pneumatic General:
>The magnum opus of this thread, the real deal: a precise definition of the Capital (can be otherwise called the Demiurge, though gnosticism as a whole is stupid) and a precise diagnosis of all the ills of modern global society.

The Capital is an unthinking, impersonal and abstract hyper-entity that is the resultant of the globalized economic calculation of hitherto capitalism (but not of Capitalism as a basic system).

The Capital has only 2 basic principles:
>1. revenue maximization
>2. profit maximization

The Capital utilizes 4 active measures to satiate these 2 principles. They are described here:
>>20817541

the Capital's only flaw, since ultimately it's an unthinking system, is that under the Capital's system, people do not want to procreate and so this is its limitation: the Capital is ultimately self-concerned and in its self-concern it is anti-environment and anti-human. anti-everything.
anti-culture.
and automation will not come to save the Capital in time:
>>20817878
the Cataclysm is encroaching and by its nature, as it besets upon Humanity, technological progress starts slowing down. this, in economics, is called productivity paradox:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity_paradox
We're in the Second Productivity Paradox, but I would just call it THE productivity paradox, or simply, the Cataclysm. The cause of which escapes economists because they cannot go beyond their jewish/post-jewish (i.e. christian) programming (unlike Marx, who was ultimately quite wrong, but one cannot say he didn't escape his Jewish programming). That cause is demographic in nature.

And so this kind of "perfect" storm awaits us. It will not be perfect for us as individual humans, tho.

The magnum opus of this thread, the real deal: a precise definition of the Capital (can be otherwise called the Demiurge, though gnosticism as a whole is stupid) and a precise diagnosis of all the ills of modern global society.

The Capital is an unthinking, impersonal and abstract hyper-entity that is the resultant of the globalized economic calculation of hitherto capitalism (but not of Capitalism as a basic system).

The Capital has only 2 basic principles:
>1. revenue maximization
>2. profit maximization

The Capital utilizes 4 active measures to satiate these 2 principles. They are described here:
>>20817541

the Capital's only flaw, since ultimately it's an unthinking system, is that under the Capital's system, people do not want to procreate and so this is its limitation: the Capital is ultimately self-concerned and in its self-concern it is anti-environment and anti-human. anti-everything.
anti-culture.
and automation will not come to save the Capital in time:
>>20817878
the Cataclysm is encroaching and by its nature, as it besets upon Humanity, technological progress starts slowing down. this, in economics, is called productivity paradox:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity_paradox
We're in the Second Productivity Paradox, but I would just call it THE productivity paradox, or simply, the Cataclysm. The cause of which escapes economists because they cannot go beyond their jewish/post-jewish (i.e. christian) programming (unlike Marx, who was ultimately quite wrong, but one cannot say he didn't escape his Jewish programming). That cause is demographic in nature.

And so this kind of "perfect" storm awaits us. It will not be perfect for us as individual humans, tho.