/lit/ - Literature

>>17887464
>It kind of does, because that’s completely unrealistic, and considering the Christian divorce rate, not really effective.
That’s what a good portion of the population did before birth control. Trying to be “moderate” about sex doesn’t work either, the more sexual partners someone has, especially women, the more their ability to pairbond is inhibited

>>17205037
I'll give you an example (not that anon but this is how I understood it):
>"There's nothing objectively wrong with sexual liberation! That's like, your opinion. Nobody gets harmed if its consensual!"
>imagine woman made to that standard considering their nature
>women release less and less oxytocin with each consecutive sexual partner
>statistically, the larger her sexual past, the more unstable a woman's marriage becomes
>more likely to cheat
>her children grow up with crazy liberated feminist mother, Laura Dern in Marriage Story style
>Conclusion: the standard of sexual liberation makes terrible mothers and wives out of women. It is a false sonnet.

Basically:
[1/2]

>>10957230
>>10957219
this is primarily dependent on the woman.

Success rates of couples get exponentially worse the more partners the woman has had.

>>9827913
>>9827928

*Women are intellectually inferior to men:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/4183166.stm

*Woman are more promiscuous than men:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/3685314/Young-women-have-more-sexual-partner
s-than-men.html

*The more promiscuous a woman is the more likely her marriage will be unstable:
http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html