[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.22209545 [View]
File: 894 KB, 920x2492, 1523242454235.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22209545

>> No.22183110 [View]
File: 894 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22183110

>>22182859

>> No.19339465 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19339465

>>19337934

>> No.18935418 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, 1523242454235.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18935418

>> No.13181523 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13181523

>>13179919
>>13181431

>> No.12535836 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, 1549118739012.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12535836

>>12535586
>There is no 'is-ought' gap.
Yes there is.
>It's an abstract dichotomy
We're talking about the abstract field of philosophy
>which tries to place moral knowledge in a fundamentally different category from all other knowledge
Which is true, all lingustics and philosophets agree with this categorisation
>which isn't possible.
It certainly is. Meaning is use and all that.
>The 'is' is implicit in any 'ought', the descriptive is implicit in the normative. Always.
That's not what we are talking about. We are talking about if moral statements can be validly deduced from descriptive statements.

>> No.12522648 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, 1549045500363.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12522648

>>12522179

>> No.12517840 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, sam_harris_powerful_philosopher.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12517840

>>12517539
This guy has only contributed one thing of value to society and it's this comic.

>> No.11780267 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11780267

>>11778483

>> No.11032583 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11032583

>>11032555
The Existential Comics guy is neither comedically nor artistically gifted.
He struck gold with this one, though.

>> No.10288251 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10288251

How do i get into Christianity, specifically Roman Catholicism? I feel I ought to read works by Augustine, Aquinas, C.S. Lewis and Hume. But i don't know the order in which i should tackle them and how many more authors I should look into. Got any good guides or recommendations?

>> No.9870581 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9870581

Going to a state university right now and I'm finding this meme to be true. Classics and Philosophy seem like a patrician choice.

>> No.9376835 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9376835

>> No.8747634 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8747634

>>8747261
If you think Sam Harris is intelligent you should literally off yourself immediately.

>> No.8585242 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8585242

3/3

>> No.7886359 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, 1451527393117.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7886359

>>7886313
>>7885729

he's a hack

>> No.7402070 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7402070

>> No.6466643 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, sam harris.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6466643

>> No.6028208 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6028208

>> No.6000728 [View]
File: 895 KB, 920x2492, samHarris3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6000728

>>6000474
http://existentialcomics.com/comic/other/3

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]