/lit/ - Literature

>>15326523
lol can always predict how you are going to behave.

Do you think Epstein and his crew kept the children's blood in little vials like they did in the middle ages?

>>14830109
No. I live in the USA. It used to be very common for them to take the baby away from the parents for "tests". That's when they chop your dick. Fuck the Jews for bringing this bullshit to my country.

>>14207577
Digits aside, I find myself in a quandary. I started reading the Bible without a critical eye. Now that I have reached Isaiah I question whether I should start anew with a more critical eye.

>>14200833
The Golden Bough is a good spin. Read Wittgenstein's rebuttal first, realizing that his rebuttal gives no reasonable replacement for Frazers methods - as Frazer was chasing missing fragments and was forced to use reductive reasoning. When Wittgenstein can give a reasonable explanation as to what the golden bough is and why it is significant I will give his amended rebuttal a fresh consideration. KIM that once you have read Bough that you will not have a general understanding of "religions" but of "religion". Frazer's thesis only covers evolution of religion and he poses a universal ontology. It is still not a bad place to start. It appears to ramble and lose it's way but his revelation at the end shows that he was always on track as he brings you full circle to the answer for the question posited at the beginning.

*ritualistically murders children while saying it is a myth*