/lit/ - Literature

Make me

>>13666675
>Is a poor anon waiting for link to moon too overdone to write a story about it?

What?

>>13585090
>tongue-in-cheek

at least Foucault realized that if the proletariat would decide to slaughter all capitalists, they can not be wrong

by definition

my god Chomsky even talks about human nature in that debate
>pic related

why dont you just read anti-oedipus? it has a great introduction by foucault so you'll at least get that if you drop the book after 10 minutes.

>tfw you study late 19th century german philosophy of science and want to bite OP

>>7837662

>>6796214
if only hegel didn't a shit

>>6362761

Blatantly ideological.

What does /lit/ think if Foucault?

>>5259575


>humanism

disgusting

man is not the full measure

>>5036535

>>4811542


no we cant, because 'objectively', youre always 'racist', so your choice is then doing better or worse kinds of racism.

>>4790575


jorji friend, why did kolechian cross the border?

is joke, kolechian did not cross border

>>4776405

>In 1971 he was invited by the Dutch TV to comment on the movements of rebellion around the world, in the form of a one-on-one debate with Noam Chomsky, who could not comprehend the man. "I mean, I liked [Foucault] personally," Chomsky later reminisced. "It's just that I couldn't make sense of him. It's as if he was from a different species, or something.

Right cunts. Its time. Its time to talk about textual intentionality and the power of Christ (Meaning) to force its way into our reading practices as an eisegesis. This is the thread where we talk about the imperfection of exegetic accounts, and of the hopefulness that in the interpretive leap we will uncover the meaning as a revealed meaning, not as an interpreted meaning. That we will encounter in text, "History as it was," not merely the records of history as it was.

Shit gets real around 27 minutes in. I hope you're equipped to reread theology as a discourse on epistemology. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gy-gCEWh5-4

>>4239751
>There are people discussing fiction instead of engaging in critique.
MVQ