/lit/ - Literature

>>16826331
>Who's buying? There are many ways out of suffering, some harder to sell than others. Have fun convincing others to "terminate all life" like some kind of demented borg when we are "biologically hardwired" to disagree with you.
Creating is harder than destroying, it's harder to create this supposed absolute universal utopia where everyone is in maximum bliss with no pain and even then, it would be neutral at best compared to just dying, whereas enough advanced transhumans could wipe life cosmically

>You choose to be by continuing to be, without improving yourself. You are biologically hardwired, but if you cared you could overcome your biology.
All your "choices" just appear to be choices because you are conscious, but consciousness is actually just self-aware quantum-information, it is just as subject to causality, you don't even know what hard-wired means

>Did you choose to make this post? Do you have this little self control?
No, i didn't choose to make this, it's futile to try to fight causality

>>16826401
The burden of proof is on you for claiming that he exists, i've never seen anyone make a logical argument for God existing, pure emotional bias rather, pic related