/lit/ - Literature

>>10835677
Ah yeah, I guess I misread the question.

MMOs might fit the description OP gave but we ain't no plebs.

As well as those books written by /lit/ ('The Legacy of Totalitarianism in a Tundra' & 'Hypersphere'). Such a collaborative effort would probably not have been possible in a pre-internet age.

That instagram game made by some company during a marketing campaign in which you clicked on different photos to explore/make choices. Can't remember the name though.

pic unrelated

Beginning at her shoulder his eyes followed her arm, natural contours formed hills and valleys in a breath-taking vista. His gaze slowly descended towards her fingers in an attempt to visually quench his thirst for her skin. As he reached her painted nails he noticed the other person, wearing a white t-shirt and sporting a fashionable hairstyle dancing beside them. “I’m going to chat with him for a bit to find out his intentions and whether or not he’s bothered by my flirting with you.” She smiled, nodded and went back to swaying her lithe, almost cat-like body to the beat.

He turned to the friend and held out his hand as a gesture of goodwill, “Hey there,” he said as they shook hands. “Do you mind if I flirt with that girl? If you have your eyes set on her make your intentions clear and I’ll back off.” Unable to properly word a response, Friend nodded, usually a sign of agreement, but he didn’t seem happy at all.

Ash turned back to the girl and whispered into her ear, “I think he likes you, but I’m pretty sure I like you a lot more.” She laughed inaudibly and placed her hand on his arm. The barely perceptible weight of her touch made him curse the leather of his jacket, wishing it would disappear leaving nothing between her hand and the naked skin of his arm. He cursed all clothes, wanting nothing more than to exist in a world where his flesh would be free to touch hers. As this thought took place, Friend reappeared beside the girl and protectively put his arm around her, his touch polluting the perfect landscape of the limb he had previously admired.

The existence of objective morals has not been proved wrong. It has not been proved, which in no way means that their inexistence is right. Formal logic do not allow you to deduce anything from an unclear proposition and if P can't be proved or has not been proved yet, no indications are given on ¬P validity. You cannot justify amoralism, this is a belief as irrational as any set of arbitrary ethic rules.