/lit/ - Literature

>>11293184
>It’s obvious to anyone who is capable of being honest with themselves that the Christian view of life and the Fascist view of life are not at all compatible.
You're wrong. Franco's Spain is a real thing. Christianity can be compatible with a wide swath of things. Consider we were promised a new Earth and bodies, and that we are to garden the world and produce good fruit for God. Eugenics and transhumanism aren't off the table. Hubris that prevents their ideal implementation, however, is.
It's not exactly a problem for me, as schools and abortion clinics are used by secularists to replace the institutions of eugenics, but with no quality control beyond advertisements (aka. this kills the p-zombie). If you think that Christian ideals are incompatible with earthly rule, you are correct - the kingdom of God is within us, not an earthly kingdom. Though I do love pre-revolution France, Russia and Europe a lot more than the current one.
Christians should have more of a problem with secular humanism and communism, as they lead down to paths that avoid or even despise culture and flourishment of families, men, women and children.

>‘Where in Christian doctrine does it say we should love niggers?’ I can’t stand the ‘Deus Vult’ crowd.
Hate is odd. Most of the anger you see online is venting. Few years ago I had just written on /pol/ about my anger towards immigrants and niggers and whatnot. Then I had to leave for shopping as it was getting late. It was -30 Celsius outside. I meet two niggers and their frozen car. They asked me to help them - and I did. Didn't even feel bad about it. Most online anger doesn't translate to genocides. However, it does translate to political victories for populists and anybody who closes off borders.