[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.11935756 [View]
File: 222 KB, 477x446, 1481970880991.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11935756

>>11932420
>while reading philosophy is 3 times as much time consuming
this

>> No.10096381 [View]
File: 222 KB, 477x446, 1481970880991.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10096381

>>10096312
Found it very easily using Google.
Apply yourself.

>> No.9855770 [View]
File: 222 KB, 477x446, 1481970880991.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9855770

>>9851075

>> No.8852706 [View]
File: 222 KB, 477x446, Screen Shot 2016-12-17 at 7.02.57 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8852706

So I got caught up in the whole Jordan Peterson thing with the 'anti-PC' professor debacle, and eventually waded into his writings on psychology, philosophy, religion, etc.

If anyone here is familiar with his stuff, does it sound weird that:

1) I've read and I think (reasonably well) understood his views on religion.
2) I mostly agree with them.
3) I'm STILL an agnostic atheist despite all of that?

I dunno. This sounds weird in that I'm basically conceding every point an observant Christian is making to defend his faith, like every single argument, but still calling myself an atheist. But it sort of seems like his points don't really justify any literal belief in Christian theology, and actually point to more of a 'secular spiritualism' with Christian motifs. Let me get at them one by one.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]