/lit/ - Literature

>>6421073
More like obnoxiously pretentious. "We need never" is an archaic, Elizabethan way of speaking. It's clear that he's putting a feather in his cap when he does this.

People in his demographic, modern kids, would say "we never need to be..."

>When adults say, "Teenagers think they are invincible" with that sly, stupid smile on their faces, they don't know how right they are. We need never be hopeless, because we can never be irreparably broken. We think that we are invincible because we are. We cannot be born, and we cannot die. Like all energy, we can only change shapes and sizes and manifestations. They forget that when they get old. They get scared of losing and failing. But that part of us greater than the sum of our parts cannot begin and cannot end, and so it cannot fail.