/lit/ - Literature

>>18893896

moar

>>16139900

>>16004688
see >>15996232

>>15798066
Do you have specific questions?
If not, if you really are starting at the ground floor (great, btw!) then it's not a bad idea simply to use a 100-level college textbook on micro/macro economics. From there you can get more specific.
Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith is actually quite readable and a fine place to start if you haven't yet chosen an ideological horse in the race (Marx is fine but his major work, Capital, is billed really as a critique of political economy more than anything else... more on this later but tldr if you want a Marxist perspective youre better off reading someone who identifies as such rather than Marx himself...)

Foundations of Economics: A Beginner's Companion by Yanis Varoufakis published by Routledge is instrumental. I think it's a great place to start. He also has a book called The Global Minotaur which is a solid read on the 2008 financial crisis...

>>15390222
I found this one in the charts library, idk how relevant it is though since I only too intro to macro economics and intro to micro economics when I was in school

>>14272626
Nibba I have seen the DEMAND

Any charts that go more in depth than this one please?

ITT: we recommend science related books and nonfiction to other anons to develop more knowledge and overcome the brainlet syndrome.

7

Last.

>>12230911

>>12214001

>>11265675
It's not that good tho.
I'd try to make a good one with textbooks, but I have no idea how to do it.
Any advice on how to make a chart ?

>>10700572
Only good answer for economics ITT.

J. S. Mill has been mentioned for his political philosophy. Fine. He had an economics work too, though.

In addition, people have been mentioning Plato's Republic. This is a must-read. In addition to The Social Contract.

For economics, see pic related. Welcome to one of the only studies which is sufficiently grounded in philosophy at first, and then slowly becomes increasingly mathematical as time goes on.

How accurate is this small reading chart?

>>10675925
It is when you're analyzing an economy. Look, I simply plain don't agree with Mises. I think he raises some valid points about Capital injections, and who the fiduciary unit gets distributed to. That's about it. I like his terms of money, as well, and the history he knows is extensive.

His philosophy of how he analyzes the economic system sucks.