/lit/ - Literature

conundrum for christfags on lit...
Presupposition for this post is the fact that no one can prove the existence of God, not even Aquinas, cuz lets be real with ourselves, its the truth

With that fact in mind, if God exists he made us incapable of proving and knowing for sure that he exists.
Second presupposition for this post is that if God exists, the mainstream narrative of catcholic church and the Bible is true. Im gonna close in on the concept of afterlife in which your soul is immortal and you either spend eternity in union with God in heaven or damned forever in suffering in hell based on whether you are saved or not, and only God decides who goes where and people here on earth have their theories but basically good people go to heaven or whatever.
Now, since we cannot prove the existence of God, we can only have faith and human faith is really shaky and inconsistent. Sure, you can train it and force it but imo its not real then, or God can show you signs like he does to minority of people and even then faith of those people is succeptible to doubt.
So, supposing the second presupposition is true, literally nothing in your life matters at all except whether you'll be saved or not.
And when you remember the first presupposition that you cannot prove God's existence, you forget about him. You live day to day, often not thinking about morality of your deeds, which affects the chances of your salvation which is the only important thing in your existence, given the second supposition is true.
Now i would like to make a case that this means that God is unfair, therefore not perfect,
because revealing himself like he did to St. Paul, therefore proving his existence, would literally save anyone and make everyone a best person they can be so they would be saved or atleast maximize the number of souls saved in all of humanity.
Therefore either he doesnt exist at all or my second presupposition is false, the narrative of the church and the bible is not true.

fite me irl fagits