/lit/ - Literature

>>11133707
This is prejudice and you should stop with it. There are better prejudices out there to have. Anyway, moving on...
>>11133770
... any muslim (he didn't used the term muslim) who didn't follow this branch of islam, isen't realy a muslim. So the wahabbi tribes and followers were free to pillage and slave other muslims, because "they weren't real muslims". Until today slavery is a problem in muslim majority countrys, althought they publicaly deny the use "slave" term, the working conditions are the same, not to mention the human traffiking, forced marriages, abuse of human rights, and so on. Even funnier is to see the mental gynastics of BLM members or other leftists to talk about African slavery. Places like the Kingdom of Mali were full of slaves of all kinds, this is even said in the UNESCO collection of history of Africa. The subsaharan africans were a vital part in the slave trade with the muslim world and european colonizers, not only that, they sold slaves to one another. So Africa isen't a place full of roses like these liers like to put.
In the Americas, the native population wasen't very good at the european labour logic, specialy in Brazil. Here, they indians didn't liked to be pushed to their limit, and fleed deeper and deeper into the continent, promoting resistance and geting harder and harder to get. One form of expedition, the "bandeiras" were long and big travels by colonizers to find indian tribes and slave then. Eventualy, the introduction of african slaves made it much easier. The african slaves were of mixed tribes, so they didn't realy understand one another; the africans were more used to the european work logic, thus were more tolerant of the unlimited work they had to do, unlike the indians. The spanish americas used indians too, but the indian in spanish american wasen't like the brazilian indian. The brazilian indian was much more primitive, he didn't have reached the "classical" period, that is, they werent urbanized like many aztecs, mayas or incas. I can be wrong in this, but this is my understading of the situacion. I can't say clearly about the US tho, because I don't know if there was proper slavery of native north americans as there was slavere of native population of latin america. Anyway, all this I am saying is the slavery meme is a hoax. Slavery is a universal and, worst yet, NATURAL. And it isen't because it's natural that is good, just saying. Slavery was also a social status thing. The chinese serfs that remind me more of slaves, and the more you had, the greater you were! And how did people took the slaves? By war, of course! And this is going to be my next point.

3. Violence, war and social structures of colonialism
It's very funny the lie people say about slave populations. People like to claim that they were peacefull and full of love for nature, so let me tell you, how full of shit this is. For example, in Africa, there were groups 100% dedicated to slave trade, why? Because, with ...
Part 3