/lit/ - Literature

>>22364548
The protocols were not supposed to be an instruction manual

>make a thread on /lit/ about threads being rotten by subhuman posters
>68% of the posts made by the same subhuman scum I was referring to
>jannies delete the entire thread

>make a thread on r*ddit about wathever theme
>random subhuman posting
>jannies ban the subhumans posters and delete their posts on the thread
>thread continues...

Why are (you) like this? Do you, subhuman posters, have some kind of anal perversion with jannies deleting threads because of you? You act like sexually repressed children, trying to defecate on everything so daddy comes and beat your ass so you can get your sublimated anal-homosexual pleasure. That's pretty cringe, if you haven't noticed yet.

>make a thread on /lit/ asking for book recomendations based on a book I liked
>thread become a storm of shit(post)

>make a thread on r*ddit asking for book recomendations based on a book I liked
>get some US(hit) tier recomendations, but overall get at least 1 or 2 actually good and informed recomendations/opinions

Why is /lit/ so worthless? I know some of you also post in other pages ---but why keep coming to this shithole where no one reads here?

>>21302527
Based