/lit/ - Literature

>>7317922
I know you can see that I'm the original >>7317849, so I want to say

ごめんなさい, sorry, I was wrong. This is the better solution. I spoke without thinking. Thank you for caring about 4chan.

>>7303102
>cats
I love smoking weed with my cat, and then reading to each other.

>>7274104
Here, I'll trace the argument, point for point, so you can understand where you went wrong.

>>7274054
>The Bible is mostly boring, it's just desert people laws and myths that wouldn't interest anyone if it wasn't part of a popular religion.

Then you say
>>7274063
>"It wouldn't interest anyone if it wasn't part of a popular religion"?
>Please learn to think.

I'm going to interpret this as saying "If it's part of a popular religion, it would obviously interest people from a literary point of view because popular religions would naturally have good religious literature."

Finally, you say
>>7274104
>"Did you think people were making [religious] allusions because they were fans of Christianity, not poetry?"

The answer is pretty simple. Yeah, I do, and I stand by that statement. People don't repeat "Spare the rod and spoil the child" or "Hail, Mary, full of Grace" because they think it's good literature, they repeat them because it's part of their religious dogma.

I'm trying to write the script of a delusional Weebo meeting an old japanese actor for Kirusawa.

Fish out of water and odd couple formula, but I want to warn people about going to deep down the comfy NEET Seat.