/lit/ - Literature

A lot of these philosophers like Aristotle and Descartes and Kant and Plato, ect, they never seem to notice that even if they try and act as completely logical and rational as possible, whatever they consider as logical or rational is an aesthetic personal choice on their own part. Do any philosophers notice this or agree with what I am saying? That whatever we decide is most logical and reasonable is still an aesthetic choice on our part

Any authors take the view that even if God exists, Morality would still not be determined by them? That is, even if there is a god, there is still no objective moral authority?

>>21441996
>>21442031

Much appreciate gents

>favorite philosopher is Hume
who should i read next other then hume?

>>21376064
bump for original content

I want to know of some kind of philosopher who has really sappy, cheesy, naive, morals. Like the opposite of Nietzsche in terms of morals. I want someone who's a total optimist.
>Love everybody equally
>Kindness is most important
shit like that. Anyone fitting this description?

The Bhuddists and Stoics both seem to say
>stop wanting what you don't have.
what philosophy says
>stop fucking around and go get it.

I started reading philosophy recently and I have to ask; Is it normal to just fundamentally, inherently, and completely disagree with 99% of the things basically every single philosopher says? I mean I was reading some various philosophers and I can not find a single statement I agree with. All of it I feel is just completely wrong, I cannot agree with the premises or conclusions they are constructing, to the point it's annoying. I just want to stop them and say "No, that's wrong, dead wrong, completely unfounded in reality." and it keeps happening with EVERY philosophy book that I read. I feel like I must be missing something here. Does anyone else feel like this? I keep getting really annoyed with authors.

Do any philosophers try to harmonize the Stoics and the Skeptics?

>>20669913
I am OP and I literally don’t understand what your talking about, I might be actually autistic. Can you try explaining what you mean again. If I am genuinely brained damaged it would be better to know.

Why don't more philosophers talk about the obvious inherent weirdness of existing? The fact that it's impossible and so strange to be at whatsoever in the first place like look around man, where are we. The fuck is this.

>>19826823

Is there a religion or a philosophy which involves dating god? Like sexual pan-psychism? I view God as a kind of genderless being and have been getting some sausy visions of a very cute higher power and I'm wondering if there's anyone who advocates dating God.

How would the various philosophical schools really alter your daily living? If a person was a platonist, what would be different in their lifestyle? Same question for stoics. skeptics or kantians or so on.