/lit/ - Literature

>>18753539
In response to Ops pic I believe obviously certain parts of the human body have an erogenous or sexual quality when observed and put together in a neat package like a steam engine. Not one part generally is enough unless someone has a weird foot fetish.

But baseline have you ever noticed that say the most attractive clothes often involve triangular shapes around the breasts and and genitalia. Notice how the legs are covered in nylon leading up to the buttocks which is then barely occluded with a very tight triangle.

I would say this is more alluring then a purely naked human being because it entices the imagination and begs to obverser to come fuck me.

Ask yourself would the woman in the pic be more attractive or desirable if she was naked or clothed in erotic garments. My point is that revealing clothes bring out more sexuality than someone who is just purely naked.

Its really about selling a subtle message because a naked person could just be a nudist or taking a shower which are rather neutral but as soon as someone is wearing erotic clothing and makeup its a signal that I want to fuck and im hot.

I would say its like imagine if human beings had a mating call or display that involved using the environment and resources we have to attract people to have sex with us because we have more complex social structures and psychology.

To me creating a fetish is knowing the interplay of geometry, colours, and setting a picture to signal peoples' lower instincts.