/lit/ - Literature

>>4230788
>And councillar governement doesn't produce secret police, it produces open courts.
You are not just a Utopian fool for advocating this, but you clearly disregard (whitewash, even) anarchist history. Makhno had a secret police. And for a good fucking reason. Every leftist revolution must protect itself from the bourgeois and there is NO EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE. Open courts, don't do detective work, phone-tapping, busts, COINTELPRO, you bloody hippy!

>The Workers' State of Councils doesn't produce social services, it directly operates production for need as in the Food and Medical supply
SOCIAL SERVICES isn't about distributing food and med supplies, you mongrel.

>Government by proletarians doesn't produce bureaucracy
Every anarchist society so far had bureaucracy, you tit. You might not LIKE to call it that, but when you have limited amount of food you wish to distribute evenly among people, you'll have bureaucracy. When you want to run postal services, you'll have bureaucracy. I'm not saying it's desirable, I'm saying its necessary.

>it further produces democracy amongst the class, revolutionising the technical and social relations of production.
Just as a state can do it. Oh, yes. More effectively.