/lit/ - Literature

>>7272835

OP here, I don't like you. Just because you conform to a paradigm of established standard doesn't mean we all do. Some of us have developed the ability to think critically and have noticed how MFA graduates are skewing the idea of what a 'good' Nobel is and dare to opine otherwise. Not that that has anything to do with your argument at all, which seems to focus on the idea that one must be an established writer before attempting to invent new words (what? why should a publishing house screening process and appealing to the lowest common denominator suddenly decide you can now try to invent words?) and I fail to see how a writer who hasn't published anything shouldn't be called an 'aspiring writer' it they are literally aspiring writers. And I'm not even going to go into how you fishing cringe material in such a description is totally arbitrary and says way more about you than anything else...

Just because you're unable to think outside the box and adhere to standards upheld by such a n aforementioned box doesn't mean we all are. Some of us are dreamers and some of us even dare to envision.

I feel sorry for you.