[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.9857667 [View]
File: 37 KB, 800x600, 1502040568543.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9857667

>>9857661
You say that like its a bad thing

>> No.9416117 [View]
File: 37 KB, 800x600, sniff, what you say to me you punk bish and sho on and sho on.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9416117

Serious Question: If all the authors of the Western canon were dropped into a battle royale to fight to the death who would win?

>> No.9387271 [View]
File: 37 KB, 800x600, zizek and chomsky.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9387271

>>9387261
People like Chomsky are boring because they're all facts, facts and facts. Facts alone haven't saved us thus far, they're no weapon against ideology.

Zizek is much more interesting, he is wrong on so many things yet his methods of critique are great tools to adapt.

>> No.7168802 [View]
File: 35 KB, 800x600, noam-chomsky-zizek--argument.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7168802

>>7168793
there is no butterfly fam, just you and me. Didn't Zizek talk about Rammstein undermining nazi symbolism by using it in their own way? Im doing that but with « Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ »

>> No.7142741 [View]
File: 35 KB, 800x600, noam-chomsky-zizek--argument.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7142741

>its a Faust clone

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Works_based_on_Faust

>> No.6954610 [View]
File: 35 KB, 800x600, noam-chomsky-zizek--argument.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6954610

>>6954425
muh human nature (big Other fallacy)

>> No.6883637 [View]
File: 35 KB, 800x600, noam-chomsky-zizek--argument.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6883637

>> No.6597342 [View]
File: 37 KB, 800x600, noam-chomsky-zizek--argument.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6597342

>>6597306
We all nkow that you have not a GF

>> No.6596004 [View]
File: 37 KB, 800x600, noam-chomsky-zizek--argument.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6596004

>>6595538
>>6595538
>>>For example, Noam Chomsky has argued that postmodernism is meaningless because it adds nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge.


>philosophy must be useful you guys

>> No.6593891 [View]
File: 37 KB, 800x600, noam-chomsky-zizek--argument.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6593891

>>6593323
>Can an 'exact science' exist, or is there a degree of uncertainty in every subject area?
fallacy

there is no uncertainty, because there is no absolute in most cases (unless you output a integer say '' the number of persons in some room'')

in science, there is a choice of many things: of postulates/axioms/principles/methods for induction/methods for collection and treatment of experimental data


the output of the scientific method is a variety of models which describe and predict, more or less broadly, more or less accurately, more or less quantitatively, more or less qualitatively some phenomenon assumed to be repeatable within a framework determined by each model.


Then each person chooses her models that she likes the most and endlessly debates politically with the other persons in asking which method is better than the other, which must be applied in such fields, in such social doctrine.

>> No.6591709 [View]
File: 35 KB, 800x600, noam-chomsky-zizek--argument.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6591709

please delete this picture OP, my low test book reading self can't handle this

>> No.6401298 [View]
File: 35 KB, 800x600, noam-chomsky-zizek--argument.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6401298

critique him through Marx and Lacan

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]