/lit/ - Literature

>>15283014
>No idea why you stacked your books in the least accessible way possible though.
don't have a shelf and i think they look more visually pleasing this way than horizontally, also need space for other things
>Fucking weird book selection.
yeah it happens

>>15273583
Just finished Harry Potter where do I go nect?

>>15273836
Good point
>>15273847
Everyone does but they pretent to not be. Pretentious is what you are
>>15273865
Suffering isn't that subjective. You can poke any living being in the eye and it will go ouch. You can mentally abuse most people. We all have a very similar experience. By that logic you couldn't prove anything beside purely theoretical mathematical issues. You have to make some assumptions. If you don't think so kick a dog and see what happens
>>15273940
You are literally seething with hatred.
Your ad hominems aren't even true, I am not ugly. Go punch a pillow or smth
>So then natalists are virtuous because they are not having as many children as they possibly can (probably numbering in the hundreds, even more if you take into account artificial methods of reproduction). Therefore, the difference between an anti-natalist and a natalist who has a few children is like the difference between not punching someone and lightly tapping someone

Sure having one kid is less bad than having 100, that would be my view. Point?
>It still boggles my mind how anti-natalists think they can argue about what families and fathers are like without ever having started a family. It's like thinking to yourself, as a white guy, that all blacks are one-dimensional murder machines.
It still boggles my mind how pseudo-natalist on 4chan can't comprehend that not everyone has the same subjective experiences. I was born in a family. I know many other families from friends, I know stories, I just look around in life.
Half of all marriages end in divorce. And I know a handful of fathers who had children and their wives left them. I have seen a lot of abuse and hatred from parents towards their kids.
Shut your fucking mouth, you probably yourself don't even have kids asshole
>And in another post, an anon described how anti-natalism is narcissistic because it strokes the ego and allows you to spend money and time on vidya and movies and whatever inane shit it is you like to consume as you wait for death because you're too much of a milquetoast to commit to difficult beliefs like those of the Church of Euthanasia, efilism, or just plain offing yourself.
You still didn't attack the ethical argument for antinatalism. If having children is wrong there is nothing wrong with byusing lotz of dem vidogaymes and jacking off toi hentai. I thinkl you probably are much more of a pussy irl than me aswell.
Retarded zoomer