/lit/ - Literature

>>17413222
I understand the value of description in prose and recognize this is technically well written, but my eyes glaze over. I like what Steinbeck's Sweet Thursday has to say on the matter.
>I like some description but not too much of that. . . . Sometimes I want a book to break loose with a bunch of hooptedoodle. . . . Spin up some pretty words maybe or sing a little song with language. That’s nice.

>But I wish it was set aside so I don’t have to read it.

>>12953190
nigger wut

read the chart, especially where it says "no" and points downward

>>12946255
>I know central american spanish so I have no problem reading medieval tuscan
Lol wut, that's like saying you can read ancient cantonese monk scrolls because you're fluent in korean