/lit/ - Literature

>>14264756
I wish
>tfw out of drugs

>>12816322
reading the summary on wikipedia should answer that question pretty easily.
much like the endless slew of garbage writings from politicians and public figures (Ben Shapiro or Obama's new book are good examples), this type of work sells because it reaffirms everything the purchaser already believed.
It's the literary equivalent to a Buzzfeed or PragerU video.

>>12774390
>Accelerationism. 4chan will be actively designing the meaning of the term, and that's quite interesting.
So does this mean the prior meaning of accelerationism will be drowned in noise?
I'm already seeing /pol/tards using 'accelerationism' to describe 'escalating violence between identity groups'
Will we need a new word for 'using capital's tendency to deterritorialize in order to inspire radical social change' once the normies hear of this term in the /pol/ context?

>>12769996
I mean, I identified a lot with him when I was a teenager
What is the normie consensus on him?